ROTARY CLUB ADDRESS SEPTEMBER 2004
By Roy Kelly, Principal, Kings College
One of the nice
things about having a formal introduction is not having to say to much about
yourself. I am reminded of this by the story of George Bush Junior who recently
visited a home for the elderly and walked up to one man sitting in a chair and
said "Hello do you know who I am?" The old man looked at him, pointed to one of
the nurses and said "No but if you ask her she will tell you."
Having spent nearly two years in New Zealand I am pleased to report
to you that there are many positive signs about education in this country,
albeit acknowledging this is from the viewpoint of an Australian private school
educator. In particular, I am delighted to see there are many excellent state
schools in New Zealand. This statement may appear odd, given my career history
working only in independent school education. However, independent schools need
strong state schools to keep them focused, successful and dynamic. When parents
choose to pay $13000 for their son's or daughter's education when there is a
no-fee school option nearby, means that market forces are truly at work. In
Australia, the state schools have been under-resourced and poorly led for a
number of years, resulting in little real competition for private schools. Parents
have voted with their feet and now over 35% of students attend independent
schools. Australian State school teachers must take some of the blame for this
situation after too many industrial strikes and placard demonstrations which
has seen them forego Saturday sport and adopt a union driven agenda that has
won them few friends amongst parents.
However , whilst acknowledging that there is a healthy side to
education in this country, I must also state that there are some worrying signs
appearing here. There has been a reasonable amount of turmoil in New Zealand
education in the last few years, with the introduction of a new qualification
system in NCEA and the removal of excellent examinations such as NZEST and
Bursary. The introduction of the NCEA has been rushed and poorly planned. The
adoption of three new and radical national qualification levels within just
three years is without precedent on a world scene and the resultant problems
are not surprisingly substantial.
Unfortunately, the educational debate has become one of either/or as
the defenders of the faith argue for NCEA or its main alternative the Cambridge
International Examinations. At King's College we offer both systems as a dual
pathways and, whilst this has meant there has been a huge workload for our
teachers, the choice is essential for our clientele. We also have the unique
ability to monitor the progress of both systems. I wish the Education Minister
would seriously sit down with the critics of the NCEA system and listen to
their concerns in an attempt to make the system workable, rather than adopt the
incredibly defensive position he so often does by making uninformed criticisms
of the CIE. Given a free choice in Year 12, 70% of King's College students have
chosen the demanding and rigorous challenges of Cambridge examinations.
Similarly, more and more new students, both boys and girls, are coming to us
because of their disaffection with the NCEA experience. A standards-based
qualification stands or falls on the validity and reliability of the standards
set. However, the lack of consistency in the NCEA standards within subjects,
between subjects and between years needs immediate action.
The reality is that King's College would have loved to have remained
totally within the New Zealand education system and so I believe would have
Auckland Grammar, McLeans College, Senior College and many of the other 40 New
Zealand schools which are now members of the Cambridge Schools Association. In
my twenty months as Headmaster not once has any member of the Ministry of
Education even inquired as to why we offer Cambridge examinations or more
importantly to ask what we feel should be done to improve the NCEA offering. It
is only by listening to your critics that you found out what needs to be done
and the dangers of only listening to the converted is obvious. The notion that
the situation at Cambridge High School is just one rogue school taking
advantage of new rules and regulations is far from the truth. Universities face
an enormous challenge of trying to select tertiary bound students from the data
that will be sent to them in January. The fact that just two weeks ago the
Associate Professor of Education at Otago University went to the effort in the
Herald to publicly advertise and state that the NCEA qualification is fatally
flawed is a serious indictment on the system, its creators and its defenders.
Another worrying trend in New Zealand education is the ever growing
amount of government interference in schooling, with more and more bureaucratic
intervention, but paradoxically, the financial support of independent schools
is declining. Whether it be in terms of the degree of over-assessment of
students currently occurring at all school levels or the degree of
over-accountability demanded of teachers, the reality is that teachers and
schools need to be trusted more and be required to fill in fewer forms. The
teaching profession needs to claim back some of the ground which is ours and
fight the ever-increasing bureaucratic demands which, in all honesty, rarely
improves the teaching and learning in schools.
Much of the beauty in teaching lies in its perennial battle between
the professionalism of the industry and the amateur nature of the art. Here I
refer to the traditional definition of amateur, which refers to involvement for
pure enjoyment and pleasure. Think about the beauty that existed in rugby when
it existed only in its amateur form... .and from what I remember the All Blacks
were invincible then! We must ensure that bureaucracy and the ever-increasing
litigious demands on schools never diminishes the enjoyment, pleasure and
idiosyncrasies which characterize great teaching -.I am sure that some of your
favourite teachers at school were characters who were rather 'different' from
the pack. The sad reality is that these unique teachers are being driven away
from the profession.
In addition, the Government has capped funding to independent
schools at $40million and refuses to review this unfair policy which, through
the growth in the number of independent schools and an increase in school
rolls, has had a significant effect on independent schools. At King's College
we have had a reduction of over $300,000 in the last two years and this has had
an obvious effect on our budget and our fees. It is interesting to compare the
differences between the Australian Federal Government's support of Independent
schools and that of the current New Zealand Government, which has just 4% of
all students in Independent schools, although this figure is steadily growing.
The New Zealand Institute of Economic Research study of the impact
of independent schools completed last year stated quite clearly that increased
funding of independent schools would produce cost savings and efficiencies for
the Government of over $100 million. However, the fact is that the Government has
chosen to ignore the report. Perhaps with an election looming this may change.
In my speech day address last year I highlighted some other concerns
that have been noted by Dr John Hattie at the University of Auckland in which
he quoted from a recent OECD survey, which included NZ education statistics and
revealed some interesting comparisons;
- NZ had the greatest number of
teachers who have overseas teaching degrees - many from 3rd
world nations. Are we happy with this situation?
- Of all the OECD nations NZ has the
greatest number of teachers with degrees who do not teach. We need to ask
why this is the case?
- NZ Principals spend the greatest
amount of time in administration of all of the OECD nations. This is not
where principals want to be.
- There are 131 teacher education
qualification institutions or sites in NZ - an incredible number given we
have a population of just 4 million.
These statistics highlight some serious problems with New Zealand
education which need to be addressed with medium term goals and a vision for
the future which places education towards the top of Government priorities. A
major concern lies with the attraction of teachers to the profession. New
Zealand schools are only currently operational because of the influx of
overseas teachers to this country. More and more of our teachers are moving
overseas or out of the profession, because of their dissatisfaction of what is
happening here. In many important subject areas such as Physics and Mathematics
the average age of teachers in Australasia is now over 50. The next decade will
see a huge retirement of teachers which will leave the country in disarray if
sensible decisions about the profession are not made. The solution is not to
simply throw more money into salaries, although that is part of the answer.
Teachers have never gone into the job for the money it provides, but they have
always been attracted to the profession in the past. Young people today do not
see the profession as being attractive because of the lack of advancement
opportunities, the lack of support for teachers and the increasing litigious
nature of our society which, as just one example, makes males fearful of
becoming primary school teachers. To ignore these pressures is to do so at our
peril, but there is time to address the issues with brave policy making and new
paradigms.
The biggest single cost increase in all schools in the last decade
has been in the area of information technology. This is not surprising as this
form of technology offers some excellent learning opportunities and changes to
the teaching and learning dynamic in the classroom. However, I do worry that at
times the technology can drive teaching and learning, rather than the other way
around. For me it is 'access' to technology rather than ubiquitous technology
which is crucial. A teacher should choose when IT is the most relevant learning
tool when planning a lesson rather than feel obliged to use it merely because
each student has a laptop in class. Appropriate use of technology might well
become the catch-cry of the next decade. However, Design Technology courses do
offer some unique and important opportunities for students. Here I am referring
to robotics, electronics, mechatronics and hard material technologies which are
courses essential for students in the 21st century. We need to
provide our students with skills and a knowledge base that will reflect the
working environment that they will face in the future. Certainly, New Zealand
needs a creative, skills based and entrepreneurial workforce now, not in ten
years time and schools need to reflect this.
Working with modern teenagers is not without its difficulties, and
yet there are so many wonderful opportunities as well. More than ever,
students, parents and families need leadership from schools in areas not
required in past generations. One important area is in values education. When
we were children, values were explicitly taught to us through our parents or
the Church we attended. Few students currently attend church and parents are
busier than ever before with often both husband and wife working full time. At
last year's Board Strategic Planning day we identified the core values that
make King's College the unique and important place it is.These are as follows:
The pursuit of learning, the development of moral courage,
generosity of spirit, tolerance, honesty, respect, gratitude and spirituality.
We strongly believe that these values are the foundation of the true character
of King's College, but whereas in past years these could have been assumed,
that is no longer the case. These values should identify the College's needs
and these needs should then set our goals as a school. This has been an
important part of our strategic planning process
On a personal level, the
reality gap that exists between 'what I believe in' and 'how I live' is
worrying people of all ages, not the least being teenagers. A person who does
not know what he or she stands for or what they should stand for will never
enjoy true happiness or success. We have a crucial role in affirming these
important core values of the school and it is a challenge that we readily meet.
The Millenium teenager needs this more than ever. A phrase I heard recently
says it all - it described teenagers as being 'homeless in their own homes' and
as screenagers being addicted to computer games, movies and the mobile phone.
They are all too willing to state their rights without remembering their
responsibilities and, not surprisingly, depression and suicide continues to be
a major affliction in teenage years.
Accordingly, at King's
College we plan to develop the explicit teaching of values through the new RE
programme being introduced this year and perhaps one day to lead a values
outreach programme for the wider school community with guest speakers and
ethical topics being presented to parents and other interested parties. Whilst
admitting to some bias, I believe there is nothing so important as the
education of the young. In fact as GK Chesterton once said 'education is simply
the soul of one society as it passes from one generation to the next'. It is
important that we ensure that our soul is deeply preserved at King's College
and at all of the New Zealand schools which are blessed with this crucial task.